AMC opposes the Northern Pass Transmission Project as proposed
A high-voltage electric transmission line traversing 192 miles through New Hampshire to bring hydropower from Quebec to the New England electric grid.
A transmission corridor two-thirds of which will carry above-ground lines sited on towers up to 155 feet tall, requiring more than 40 miles of new right of way (ROW), and significant expansion of existing ROWs in the North Country and south of Franklin.
A project that is not needed for grid reliability but that cuts a swath through some of New Hampshire's most scenic landscapes, and will degrade natural, cultural, and recreation resources of state, regional, and national significance.
As currently proposed, the project remains above-ground for two-thirds of its route through New Hampshire, and will require 40 miles of new right-of way (ROW) through the forests of Coos County, the widening of existing ROWs further south, and new towers of up to 155 feet tall to carry the lines. The proposed route traverses some of New Hampshire's most scenic landscapes, and will impact tourism and recreational experiences throughout the state.
Northern Pass does not provide "green" power: Northern Pass will require massive hydro impoundments in Quebec, the five largest of which would be the equivalent of flooding 50% of New Hampshire alone, and which would not meet US environmental standards. The project will divert multiple large rivers, most larger than any river in New Hampshire, with devastating impacts on hundreds of miles of river ecosystems. This flooding of boreal forests results in the emission of significant amounts of greenhouse gasses, and releases mercury.
The project applicant has not considered important alternative routes or fully taken advantage of underground transmission technologies. While Northern Pass proposes to bury 60 miles of the 192-mile route, primarily around the White Mountain National Forest, projects in New York and Vermont propose to fully bury comparable high-voltage transmission lines from eastern Canada to southern New England.
The transmission line would pass through 32 New Hampshire communities, 31 of which have voted to oppose the project (a total of 33 New Hampshire communities have voted to oppose Northern Pass).
The Presidential Permit process thus far has resulted in a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) that was released in July 2015. While this document is foundational to all three permits, we do not expect to have a final DEIS until sometime in 2017. And even if both the Presidential Permit and Special Use Permit are granted, the project cannot be built without SEC certification.
The SEC certification process began in December, 2016, when the SEC determined that the Application was complete. AMC has intervened in this quasi-judicial process, and is represented by legal counsel. We will argue that the project as proposed will have an unreasonable impact on NH’s natural character, including impacts to landscape aesthetics, cultural and recreational resources, and forest fragmentation.
Demand for the power planned to be carried over Northern Pass was brought in question in October of 2016, when the winners of the Southern New England states' Clean Energy RFP (request for proposals) were announced, and Northern Pass was notably not among those selected. Read more on our Conservation Blog,Southern New England States Reject Northern Pass (October 31, 2016).
In December of 2015, the NH Site Evaluation Committee (SEC) accepted the Northern Pass application as complete. Since then, the review process has been on-going, with the schedule and process benchmarks in flux. AMC is vigorously engaged along with colleague organizations and close to 150 other intervening parties in every step of this quasi-judicial review process, which is currently expected to culminate in an SEC decision to approve the project as proposed or not by September 30, 2017.
Other events of course impact the context in which this project is being considered. For example, the permitting of other transmission projects such as the NE Clean Energy Link, the price and supply of natural gas, and growing interest in off-shore wind and energy storage as evidenced by the energy legislation passed in Massachusetts this past summer, all could impact the Northern Pass permitting process. Stay tuned to these pages for regular updates on what is going on with Northern Pass.
Southern New England States Reject Northern Pass (October 31, 2016)
N.H. Conservation Groups Applaud DOE Decision on Supplemental DEIS for Northern Pass (September 25, 2015)
AMC, Colleagues Issue Request for Supplement to Northern Pass DEIS (PDF, 180 kb) (September 14, 2015)
AMC Offers Initial Comments on Northern Pass DEIS (July 23, 2015)
Appalachian Mountain Club Files Revised Scoping Comments on Northern Pass EIS (PDF, 380 kb) (November 5, 2013)
AMC and Others File Joint Scoping Comments on Northern Pass EIS (PDF, 706 kb) (October 30, 2013)
Filing with U.S. Department of Energy regarding Northern Pass: 'Comments of Conservation Law Foundation, Appalachian Mountain Club, and Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests on Amended Application' (September 17, 2013)
AMC submits scoping comment petition with 2,000 signatures (PDF) (December 14, 2012)
Northern Pass Project Would Impact Resources of Regional and National Significance (September 26, 2012)
Appalachian Mountain Club's Northern Pass Public Testimony (March 16, 2011)